Skip to content
InnoReviews

Google Tensor G6 vs Samsung Exynos 1610

Google Tensor G6
66.1Inno Score
VS
S
—Inno Score
63.3CPU30.7
53.8GPU—
72.3Benchmarks—
84Efficiencyspec-based—
1 spec wins — Google Tensor G61 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1610

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G6

  • Stronger CPU score: 63 vs 31
  • 71% higher Max clock: 4.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610

  • 14% higher cores: 8 vs 7

General

General comparison: Google Tensor G6 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecGoogle Tensor G6Samsung Exynos 1610
Announced20262026
Process3 nm—
ArchitectureArmv9.3—

CPU

CPU comparison: Google Tensor G6 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecGoogle Tensor G6Samsung Exynos 1610
Cores78+14%
Core configuration1x4.1 GHz ARM C1-Ultra + 4x3.4 GHz ARM C1-Pro + 2x2.65 GHz ARM C1-Pro2 + 6
Max clock4.1 GHz+71%2.4 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Google Tensor G6 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecGoogle Tensor G6Samsung Exynos 1610
GPUImagination PowerVR CXTP-48-1536Mali-G68
GPU clock1,286 MHz—

AI

AI comparison: Google Tensor G6 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecGoogle Tensor G6Samsung Exynos 1610
NPUGoogle TPU—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Google Tensor G6 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecGoogle Tensor G6Samsung Exynos 1610
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth6.05.3

Media

Media comparison: Google Tensor G6 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecGoogle Tensor G6Samsung Exynos 1610
Video capture8K@30fps—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Google Tensor G6 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecGoogle Tensor G6Samsung Exynos 1610
AnTuTu1,994,033—
Geekbench 6 (single)2,724Top 13%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)7,535Top 14%—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme3,420Top 34%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup