Google Tensor G6 vs Samsung Exynos 2400e
63.3CPU49.9
53.8GPU47.8
72.3Benchmarks66.7
84Efficiencyspec-based66.5
6 spec wins — Google Tensor G62 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400e
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor G6 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 55.8, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+13) and GPU (+6). Samsung Exynos 2400e still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G6
- Stronger CPU score: 63 vs 50
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 48
- Stronger benchmarks score: 72 vs 67
- 33% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,724 vs 2,050
- 32% higher Max clock: 4.1 GHz vs 3.1 GHz
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400e
- 43% higher cores: 10 vs 7
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2026 | 2024 |
| Process | 3 nm+25% | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | — | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.3 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 7 | 10+43% |
| Core configuration | 1x4.1 GHz ARM C1-Ultra + 4x3.4 GHz ARM C1-Pro + 2x2.65 GHz ARM C1-Pro | 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 4.1 GHz+32% | 3.1 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Imagination PowerVR CXTP-48-1536 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
| GPU clock | 1,286 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google TPU | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | — | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.3 |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | QHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 1,994,033+25% | 1,600,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,724+33%Top 13% | 2,050Top 21% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,535+18%Top 14% | 6,400Top 19% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,420Top 34% | 3,600+5%Top 30% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G6vs Samsung Exynos 2500VSGoogle Tensor G6vs Apple A18VSGoogle Tensor G6vs Apple A18 ProVSGoogle Tensor G6vs Apple A17 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2400evs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VSSamsung Exynos 2400evs MediaTek Dimensity 9200VSSamsung Exynos 2400evs Apple A16 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2400evs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VS
