Google Tensor vs Huawei Kirin 9000S
34.9CPU32
35.5GPU31.3
45.2Benchmarks46.6
58.3Efficiency34.5
6 spec wins — Google Tensor3 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9000S
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor wins this mobile chipset face-off, 41.2 to 35.5, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+24) and GPU (+4). Huawei Kirin 9000S still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor
- Stronger GPU score: 36 vs 31
- Stronger efficiency score: 58 vs 35
- 31% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 1,700 vs 1,300
- 29% lower process: 5 nm vs 7 nm
- 28% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,340 vs 1,050
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9000S
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | Google Tensor | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2023 |
| Process | 5 nm+29% | 7 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W+11% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | — |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-X1 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x2.62 GHz Taishan Big + 3x2.15 GHz Taishan Mid + 4x1.53 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 2.8 GHz+7% | 2.62 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G78 MP20 | Maleoon 910 |
| GPU clock | 848 MHz+13% | 750 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | HiSilicon Da Vinci NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5123) | Integrated 5G modem (unannounced) |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 680,000Top 49% | 720,000+6%Top 46% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,340+28%Top 34% | 1,050Top 44% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,150Top 42% | 3,300+5%Top 38% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,700+31%Top 60% | 1,300Top 68% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensorvs MediaTek Dimensity 7300VSGoogle Tensorvs MediaTek Dimensity 7200VSGoogle Tensorvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3VSGoogle Tensorvs Samsung Exynos 1330VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Unisoc Tiger T820VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2VS

