Google Tensor vs Huawei Kirin 980
34.9CPU24.8
35.5GPU—
45.2Benchmarks33.7
58.3Efficiency37
6 spec wins — Google Tensor0 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 980
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor wins this mobile chipset face-off, 41.2 to 30.3, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+21) and benchmarks (+12). Huawei Kirin 980 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor
- Stronger CPU score: 35 vs 25
- Stronger benchmarks score: 45 vs 34
- Stronger efficiency score: 58 vs 37
- 144% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,340 vs 550
- 58% higher AnTuTu 10: 680,000 vs 430,000
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 980
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | Google Tensor | Huawei Kirin 980 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2018 |
| Process | 5 nm+29% | 7 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | 8 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Huawei Kirin 980 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-X1 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 + 2x1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.8 GHz+8% | 2.6 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Huawei Kirin 980 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G78 MP20 | Arm Mali-G76 MP10 |
| GPU clock | 848 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor | Huawei Kirin 980 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Dual NPU (Da Vinci predecessor) |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor | Huawei Kirin 980 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 34.1 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor | Huawei Kirin 980 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5123) | Integrated LTE Cat-21 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor | Huawei Kirin 980 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 60Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor | Huawei Kirin 980 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 680,000+58%Top 49% | 430,000Top 68% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,340+144%Top 34% | 550Top 78% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,150+57%Top 42% | 2,000Top 68% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,700Top 60% | — |
Related comparisons
Google Tensorvs MediaTek Dimensity 7300VSGoogle Tensorvs MediaTek Dimensity 7200VSGoogle Tensorvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3VSGoogle Tensorvs Samsung Exynos 1330VSHuawei Kirin 980vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845VSHuawei Kirin 980vs MediaTek Dimensity 700VSHuawei Kirin 980vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680VSHuawei Kirin 980vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730VS
