Google Tensor vs Samsung Exynos 1280
34.9CPU28.1
35.5GPU—
45.2Benchmarks37.2
58.3Efficiency65.6
4 spec wins — Google Tensor2 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1280
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor wins this mobile chipset face-off, 41.2 to 39.6, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+8) and CPU (+7). Samsung Exynos 1280 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor
- Stronger CPU score: 35 vs 28
- Stronger benchmarks score: 45 vs 37
- 37% higher AnTuTu 10: 680,000 vs 495,000
- 34% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,340 vs 1,000
- 34% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 3,150 vs 2,350
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1280
- Stronger efficiency score: 66 vs 58
- 37% lower TDP (typical): 5 W vs 8 W
General
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 1280 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2022 |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | 5 W+37% |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 1280 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-X1 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.8 GHz+17% | 2.4 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 1280 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G78 MP20 | Arm Mali-G68 MP4 |
| GPU clock | 848 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 1280 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 1280 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 17.1 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 1280 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5123) | Integrated 5G (sub-6) |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.1 |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 1280 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 1280 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 680,000+37%Top 49% | 495,000Top 61% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,340+34%Top 34% | 1,000Top 52% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,150+34%Top 42% | 2,350Top 56% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,700Top 60% | — |
Related comparisons
Google Tensorvs MediaTek Dimensity 7300VSGoogle Tensorvs MediaTek Dimensity 7200VSGoogle Tensorvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3VSGoogle Tensorvs Samsung Exynos 1330VSSamsung Exynos 1280vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025VSSamsung Exynos 1280vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1VSSamsung Exynos 1280vs Samsung Exynos 1330VSSamsung Exynos 1280vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2VS
