Google Tensor vs Samsung Exynos 1480
34.9CPU33.9
36.9GPU26.5
54.4Benchmarks54.8
58.3Efficiencyspec-based73.8
3 spec wins — Google Tensor4 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1480
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: Google Tensor scores 43.7 against 43.2 for Samsung Exynos 1480. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Google Tensor edges ahead in GPU and CPU, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor
- Stronger GPU score: 37 vs 27
- 90% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 1,899 vs 1,001
- 17% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,340 vs 1,149
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1480
- 25% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 8 W
- 20% lower process: 4 nm vs 5 nm
- 11% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 3,481 vs 3,150
General
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2024 |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm+20% |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | 6 W+25% |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-X1 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.8 GHz+2% | 2.75 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G78 MP20 | Samsung Xclipse 530 |
| GPU clock | 848 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5123) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 144Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | — | 996,960Bottom 50% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 353,255Bottom 45% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 223,492Top 45% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 162,318Bottom 37% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 257,895Bottom 42% |
| AnTuTu 12 | 1,115,740Bottom 47% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,340+17%Top 33% | 1,149Top 44% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,150Top 45% | 3,481+11%Top 39% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,899+90%Top 27% | 1,001Top 46% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensorvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4VSGoogle Tensorvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3VSGoogle Tensorvs Samsung Exynos 2100VSGoogle Tensorvs Huawei Kirin T92BVSSamsung Exynos 1480vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 1480vs Huawei Kirin T92BVSSamsung Exynos 1480vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3VSSamsung Exynos 1480vs Samsung Exynos 2100VS

