Google Tensor vs Samsung Exynos 1480
34.9CPU33.7
35.5GPU28.2
45.2Benchmarks54.8
58.3Efficiency73.8
3 spec wins — Google Tensor5 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1480
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 1480 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 43.5 to 41.2, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+16) and benchmarks (+10). Google Tensor still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor
- Stronger GPU score: 36 vs 28
- 42% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 1,700 vs 1,200
- 17% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,340 vs 1,150
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1480
- Stronger benchmarks score: 55 vs 45
- Stronger efficiency score: 74 vs 58
- 47% higher AnTuTu 10: 997,950 vs 680,000
- 25% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 8 W
- 20% lower process: 4 nm vs 5 nm
General
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2024 |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm+20% |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | 6 W+25% |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-X1 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.8 GHz+2% | 2.75 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G78 MP20 | Samsung Xclipse 530 |
| GPU clock | 848 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5123) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 144Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 680,000Top 49% | 997,950+47%Top 32% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,340+17%Top 34% | 1,150Top 39% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,150Top 42% | 3,400+8%Top 36% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,700+42%Top 60% | 1,200Top 72% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 353,082Top 60% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 224,206Top 49% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 162,521Top 66% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 258,141Top 66% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensorvs MediaTek Dimensity 7300VSGoogle Tensorvs MediaTek Dimensity 7200VSGoogle Tensorvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3VSGoogle Tensorvs Samsung Exynos 1330VSSamsung Exynos 1480vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 1480vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100VSSamsung Exynos 1480vs Samsung Exynos 2100VSSamsung Exynos 1480vs Google Tensor G2VS

