Google Tensor vs Samsung Exynos 2400
34.9CPU51.7
35.5GPU49.4
45.2Benchmarks71.2
58.3Efficiency66.5
1 spec wins — Google Tensor8 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 57.9 to 41.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+26) and CPU (+17). Google Tensor still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor
- 11% lower TDP (typical): 8 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 35
- Stronger GPU score: 49 vs 36
- Stronger benchmarks score: 71 vs 45
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 58
- 182% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,914,857 vs 680,000
General
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2023 |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm+20% |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W+11% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-X1 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.2 GHz+14% |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G78 MP20 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
| GPU clock | 848 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5123) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 680,000Top 49% | 1,914,857+182%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,340Top 34% | 2,150+60%Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,150Top 42% | 6,600+110%Top 15% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,700Top 60% | 3,800+124%Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 637,914Top 26% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 562,338Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 289,405Top 40% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 425,200Top 29% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensorvs MediaTek Dimensity 7300VSGoogle Tensorvs MediaTek Dimensity 7200VSGoogle Tensorvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3VSGoogle Tensorvs Samsung Exynos 1330VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVS

