Skip to content
InnoReviews

Google Tensor vs Samsung Exynos 2600

Google Tensor
41.2Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Samsung Exynos 2600
80.4Inno Score
34.9CPU72.6
35.5GPU77.4
45.2Benchmarks81.1
58.3Efficiencyspec-based100
0 spec wins — Google Tensor6 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600

InnoReviews verdict

Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 41.2, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+42) and CPU (+38). Google Tensor still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Google Tensor

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600

  • Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 35
  • Stronger GPU score: 77 vs 36
  • Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 45
  • 325% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 7,230 vs 1,700
  • 244% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,824 vs 3,150

General

General comparison: Google Tensor versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecGoogle TensorSamsung Exynos 2600
Announced20212026
Process5 nm2 nm+60%
TDP (typical)8 W—
ArchitectureArmv8.2Armv9.3

CPU

CPU comparison: Google Tensor versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecGoogle TensorSamsung Exynos 2600
Cores810+25%
Core configuration2x2.8 GHz Cortex-X1 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A551x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency)
Max clock2.8 GHz—

GPU

GPU comparison: Google Tensor versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecGoogle TensorSamsung Exynos 2600
GPUArm Mali-G78 MP20Samsung Xclipse 960
GPU clock848 MHz—

AI

AI comparison: Google Tensor versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecGoogle TensorSamsung Exynos 2600
NPUGoogle Edge TPUSamsung NPU

Memory

Memory comparison: Google Tensor versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecGoogle TensorSamsung Exynos 2600
Memory typeLPDDR5—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Google Tensor versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecGoogle TensorSamsung Exynos 2600
ModemExternal (Samsung Exynos 5123)—

Media

Media comparison: Google Tensor versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecGoogle TensorSamsung Exynos 2600
Video capture4K@60fps—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Google Tensor versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecGoogle TensorSamsung Exynos 2600
AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared680,0002,827,538Top 14%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—947,776Top 9%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—1,052,625Top 14%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—347,409Top 25%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—479,728Top 28%
Geekbench 6 (single)1,340Top 38%2,995+124%Top 10%
Geekbench 6 (multi)3,150Top 47%10,824+244%Top 6%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,700Bottom 40%7,230+325%Top 8%

Related comparisons

Google Tensorvs MediaTek Dimensity 7300VSGoogle Tensorvs MediaTek Dimensity 7200VSGoogle Tensorvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3VSGoogle Tensorvs Samsung Exynos 1330VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VS

Try another matchup