Skip to content
InnoReviews

Google Tensor vs Samsung Exynos 9611

WINNER
Google Tensor
41.2Inno Score
VS
S
26.3Inno Score
34.9CPU21.6
35.5GPU—
45.2Benchmarks20
58.3Efficiency44.2
6 spec wins — Google Tensor1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 9611

InnoReviews verdict

Google Tensor wins this mobile chipset face-off, 41.2 to 26.3, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+25) and efficiency (+14). Samsung Exynos 9611 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Google Tensor

  • Stronger CPU score: 35 vs 22
  • Stronger benchmarks score: 45 vs 20
  • Stronger efficiency score: 58 vs 44
  • 283% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,340 vs 350
  • 216% higher AnTuTu 10: 680,000 vs 215,000

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9611

  • 37% lower TDP (typical): 5 W vs 8 W

General

General comparison: Google Tensor versus Samsung Exynos 9611
SpecGoogle TensorSamsung Exynos 9611
Announced20212019
Process5 nm+50%10 nm
TDP (typical)8 W5 W+37%
ArchitectureArmv8.2Armv8

CPU

CPU comparison: Google Tensor versus Samsung Exynos 9611
SpecGoogle TensorSamsung Exynos 9611
Cores88
Core configuration2x2.8 GHz Cortex-X1 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A554x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53
Max clock2.8 GHz+22%2.3 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Google Tensor versus Samsung Exynos 9611
SpecGoogle TensorSamsung Exynos 9611
GPUArm Mali-G78 MP20Arm Mali-G72 MP3
GPU clock848 MHz—

AI

AI comparison: Google Tensor versus Samsung Exynos 9611
SpecGoogle TensorSamsung Exynos 9611
NPUGoogle Edge TPU—

Memory

Memory comparison: Google Tensor versus Samsung Exynos 9611
SpecGoogle TensorSamsung Exynos 9611
Memory typeLPDDR5LPDDR4X-1866
Max bandwidth—14.9 GB/s

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Google Tensor versus Samsung Exynos 9611
SpecGoogle TensorSamsung Exynos 9611
ModemExternal (Samsung Exynos 5123)Integrated LTE Cat-12
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth—5.0

Media

Media comparison: Google Tensor versus Samsung Exynos 9611
SpecGoogle TensorSamsung Exynos 9611
Max display—FHD+ @ 60Hz
Video capture4K@60fps4K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Google Tensor versus Samsung Exynos 9611
SpecGoogle TensorSamsung Exynos 9611
AnTuTu 10680,000+216%Top 49%215,000Top 93%
Geekbench 6 (single)1,340+283%Top 34%350Top 89%
Geekbench 6 (multi)3,150+152%Top 42%1,250Top 90%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,700Top 60%—

Related comparisons

Google Tensorvs MediaTek Dimensity 7300VSGoogle Tensorvs MediaTek Dimensity 7200VSGoogle Tensorvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3VSGoogle Tensorvs Samsung Exynos 1330VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs MediaTek Helio G88VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs MediaTek Helio G85VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VS

Try another matchup