Google Tensor vs Samsung Exynos 990
34.9CPU29.8
35.5GPU25.7
45.2Benchmarks37.4
58.3Efficiency32.1
8 spec wins — Google Tensor0 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 990
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor wins this mobile chipset face-off, 41.2 to 30.8, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+26) and GPU (+10). Samsung Exynos 990 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor
- Stronger CPU score: 35 vs 30
- Stronger GPU score: 36 vs 26
- Stronger benchmarks score: 45 vs 37
- Stronger efficiency score: 58 vs 32
- 89% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 1,700 vs 900
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 990
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 990 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2020 |
| Process | 5 nm+29% | 7 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W+20% | 10 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 990 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-X1 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 2x2.73 GHz Exynos M5 + 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.8 GHz+3% | 2.73 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 990 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G78 MP20 | Arm Mali-G77 MP11 |
| GPU clock | 848 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 990 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 990 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5-2750 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 44 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 990 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5123) | Exynos 5123 5G (external) |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 990 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | WQHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 990 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 680,000+36%Top 49% | 500,000Top 60% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,340+49%Top 34% | 900Top 61% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,150+19%Top 42% | 2,650Top 53% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,700+89%Top 60% | 900Top 81% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensorvs MediaTek Dimensity 7300VSGoogle Tensorvs MediaTek Dimensity 7200VSGoogle Tensorvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3VSGoogle Tensorvs Samsung Exynos 1330VSSamsung Exynos 990vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695VSSamsung Exynos 990vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730GVSSamsung Exynos 990vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GVSSamsung Exynos 990vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300VS
