Google Tensor vs Unisoc Tiger T606
34.9CPU20
35.5GPU—
45.2Benchmarks20
58.3Efficiency46.7
5 spec wins — Google Tensor1 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T606
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor wins this mobile chipset face-off, 41.2 to 26.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+25) and CPU (+15). Unisoc Tiger T606 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor
- Stronger CPU score: 35 vs 20
- Stronger benchmarks score: 45 vs 20
- Stronger efficiency score: 58 vs 47
- 244% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,340 vs 390
- 189% higher AnTuTu 10: 680,000 vs 235,000
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T606
- 50% lower TDP (typical): 4 W vs 8 W
General
| Spec | Google Tensor | Unisoc Tiger T606 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2021 |
| Process | 5 nm+58% | 12 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | 4 W+50% |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Unisoc Tiger T606 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-X1 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.8 GHz+75% | 1.6 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Unisoc Tiger T606 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G78 MP20 | Arm Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU clock | 848 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor | Unisoc Tiger T606 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor | Unisoc Tiger T606 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 14.9 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor | Unisoc Tiger T606 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5123) | Integrated LTE Cat-7 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor | Unisoc Tiger T606 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 60Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 1080p@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor | Unisoc Tiger T606 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 680,000+189%Top 49% | 235,000Top 90% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,340+244%Top 34% | 390Top 89% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,150+125%Top 42% | 1,400Top 85% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,700Top 60% | — |
Related comparisons
Google Tensorvs MediaTek Dimensity 7300VSGoogle Tensorvs MediaTek Dimensity 7200VSGoogle Tensorvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3VSGoogle Tensorvs Samsung Exynos 1330VSUnisoc Tiger T606vs MediaTek Helio G85VSUnisoc Tiger T606vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSUnisoc Tiger T606vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VSUnisoc Tiger T606vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460VS