Google Tensor vs Unisoc Tiger T760
34.9CPU22.8
35.5GPU—
45.2Benchmarks33.1
58.3Efficiency54.9
5 spec wins — Google Tensor2 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T760
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor wins this mobile chipset face-off, 41.2 to 33.4, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+12) and CPU (+12). Unisoc Tiger T760 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor
- Stronger CPU score: 35 vs 23
- Stronger benchmarks score: 45 vs 33
- Stronger efficiency score: 58 vs 55
- 123% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,340 vs 600
- 66% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 3,150 vs 1,900
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T760
- 37% lower TDP (typical): 5 W vs 8 W
General
| Spec | Google Tensor | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2022 |
| Process | 5 nm+17% | 6 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | 5 W+37% |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-X1 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.8 GHz+27% | 2.2 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G78 MP20 | Arm Mali-G57 MP4 |
| GPU clock | 848 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 17.1 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5123) | Integrated 5G (sub-6) |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 680,000+62%Top 49% | 420,000Top 70% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,340+123%Top 34% | 600Top 76% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,150+66%Top 42% | 1,900Top 72% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,700Top 60% | — |
Related comparisons
Google Tensorvs MediaTek Dimensity 7300VSGoogle Tensorvs MediaTek Dimensity 7200VSGoogle Tensorvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3VSGoogle Tensorvs Samsung Exynos 1330VSUnisoc Tiger T760vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100+VSUnisoc Tiger T760vs Qualcomm Snapdragon CVSUnisoc Tiger T760vs MediaTek Dimensity 810VSUnisoc Tiger T760vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080VS