Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin 8000 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025

H
—Inno Score
VS
MediaTek Dimensity 7025
39.3Inno Score
30.7CPU28
—Benchmarks44.6
20Efficiencyspec-based54.9
0 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 80003 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 7025

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin 8000 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 8000

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 7025

  • 14% lower process: 6 nm vs 7 nm

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus MediaTek Dimensity 7025
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000MediaTek Dimensity 7025
Announced20232024
Process7 nm6 nm+14%
TDP (typical)—5 W
Architecture—Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus MediaTek Dimensity 7025
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000MediaTek Dimensity 7025
Cores88
Core configuration1x2.4 GHz + 3x2.19 GHz + 4x1.84 GHz2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.4 GHz2.5 GHz+4%

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus MediaTek Dimensity 7025
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000MediaTek Dimensity 7025
GPU—IMG BXM-8-256

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus MediaTek Dimensity 7025
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000MediaTek Dimensity 7025
Memory type—LPDDR5-3200
Max bandwidth—25.6 GB/s

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus MediaTek Dimensity 7025
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000MediaTek Dimensity 7025
Modem—Integrated 5G (sub-6)
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth—5.4

Media

Media comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus MediaTek Dimensity 7025
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000MediaTek Dimensity 7025
Max display—FHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture—2K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus MediaTek Dimensity 7025
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000MediaTek Dimensity 7025
AnTuTu—664,087Bottom 17%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—255,422Bottom 17%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—57,772Bottom 17%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—150,942Bottom 24%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—199,951Bottom 17%
Geekbench 6 (single)—950Bottom 41%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—2,250Bottom 40%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup