Huawei Kirin 8000 vs Samsung Exynos 1680
30.7CPU38.7
—GPU40.8
—Benchmarks62.7
—AIspec-based56.5
20Efficiencyspec-based68
0 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 80003 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1680
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin 8000 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 8000
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1680
- Stronger CPU score: 39 vs 31
- 43% lower process: 4 nm vs 7 nm
- 21% higher Max clock: 2.9 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2026 |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm+43% |
| Architecture | — | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.4 GHz + 3x2.19 GHz + 4x1.84 GHz | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.9 GHz+21% |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | — | Samsung Xclipse 550 |
| GPU clock | — | 1,200 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 20 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | — | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | — | 5.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | — | 6.1 |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 144Hz |
| Video capture | — | 4K@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | — | 1,363,464 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 1,376Top 33% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 4,411Top 29% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,742Top 50% |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 8000vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 8000vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300VSHuawei Kirin 8000vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 8000vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Apple A15 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 1680vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Google Tensor G4VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4VS