Huawei Kirin 8000 vs Samsung Exynos 2400e
30.7CPU49.9
—GPU47.8
—Benchmarks66.7
20Efficiencyspec-based66.5
0 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 80004 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400e
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin 8000 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 8000
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400e
- Stronger CPU score: 50 vs 31
- 43% lower process: 4 nm vs 7 nm
- 29% higher Max clock: 3.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2024 |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm+43% |
| TDP (typical) | — | 9 W |
| Architecture | — | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x2.4 GHz + 3x2.19 GHz + 4x1.84 GHz | 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.1 GHz+29% |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | — | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | — | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | QHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | — | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | — | 1,600,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 2,050Top 18% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 6,400Top 17% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,600Top 26% |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 8000vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 8000vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300VSHuawei Kirin 8000vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 8000vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300VSSamsung Exynos 2400evs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VSSamsung Exynos 2400evs MediaTek Dimensity 9200VSSamsung Exynos 2400evs Apple A16 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2400evs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VS