Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin 8000 vs Samsung Exynos 2500

H
—Inno Score
VS
Samsung Exynos 2500
66.1Inno Score
30.7CPU57.2
—GPU54.3
—Benchmarks74.2
—AIspec-based85.9
20Efficiencyspec-based79.6
0 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 80004 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin 8000 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 8000

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500

  • Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 31
  • 57% lower process: 3 nm vs 7 nm
  • 38% higher Max clock: 3.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Samsung Exynos 2500
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Samsung Exynos 2500
Announced20232025
Process7 nm3 nm+57%
TDP (typical)—8 W
Architecture—Armv9.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Samsung Exynos 2500
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Samsung Exynos 2500
Cores810+25%
Core configuration1x2.4 GHz + 3x2.19 GHz + 4x1.84 GHz1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520
Max clock2.4 GHz3.3 GHz+38%

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Samsung Exynos 2500
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Samsung Exynos 2500
GPU—Samsung Xclipse 950

AI

AI comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Samsung Exynos 2500
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Samsung Exynos 2500
NPU—Samsung NPU
AI performance—59 TOPS

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Samsung Exynos 2500
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Samsung Exynos 2500
Memory type—LPDDR5X

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Samsung Exynos 2500
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Samsung Exynos 2500
Modem—Integrated Exynos 5G modem

Media

Media comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Samsung Exynos 2500
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Samsung Exynos 2500
Video capture—8K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Samsung Exynos 2500
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Samsung Exynos 2500
AnTuTu—2,150,000
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,300Top 13%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—8,200Top 10%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—4,400Top 18%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup