Huawei Kirin 8020 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
34.1CPU57.2
25.6GPU54.3
—Benchmarks74.2
—AIspec-based85.9
20Efficiencyspec-based79.6
0 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 80206 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 28, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+29) and CPU (+23). Huawei Kirin 8020 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 8020
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 34
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 26
- 399% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 4,400 vs 882
- 97% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 8,200 vs 4,166
- 79% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,300 vs 1,288
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8020 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2025 |
| Process | 7 nm | 3 nm+57% |
| TDP (typical) | — | 8 W |
| Architecture | ARM (64-bit, custom HiSilicon cores) | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8020 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | — | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.28 GHz | 3.3 GHz+45% |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8020 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | HiSilicon Maleoon 920c | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8020 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8020 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8020 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem (unannounced) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8020 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | — | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8020 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | — | 2,150,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,288Top 40% | 2,300+79%Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,166Top 34% | 8,200+97%Top 12% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 882Bottom 18% | 4,400+399%Top 20% |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 8020vs MediaTek Helio G96VSHuawei Kirin 8020vs MediaTek Helio G95VSHuawei Kirin 8020vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712VSHuawei Kirin 8020vs MediaTek Helio G90TVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Google Tensor G6VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A17 ProVS
