Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin 8020 vs Unisoc Tiger T820

H
28Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Unisoc Tiger T820
35.6Inno Score
34.1CPU27
25.6GPU—
—Benchmarks35.9
20Efficiencyspec-based52.5
3 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 80202 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T820

InnoReviews verdict

Unisoc Tiger T820 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 35.6 to 28. Huawei Kirin 8020 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 8020

  • Stronger CPU score: 34 vs 27
  • 87% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,288 vs 690
  • 85% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 4,166 vs 2,250

Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T820

  • 18% higher Max clock: 2.7 GHz vs 2.28 GHz
  • 14% lower process: 6 nm vs 7 nm

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin 8020 versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecHuawei Kirin 8020Unisoc Tiger T820
Announced20252023
Process7 nm6 nm+14%
TDP (typical)—6 W
ArchitectureARM (64-bit, custom HiSilicon cores)Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 8020 versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecHuawei Kirin 8020Unisoc Tiger T820
Cores88
Core configuration—1x2.7 GHz Cortex-A76 + 3x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.28 GHz2.7 GHz+18%

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 8020 versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecHuawei Kirin 8020Unisoc Tiger T820
GPUHiSilicon Maleoon 920cArm Mali-G57 MP4

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin 8020 versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecHuawei Kirin 8020Unisoc Tiger T820
Memory type—LPDDR4X-2133
Max bandwidth—17.1 GB/s

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin 8020 versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecHuawei Kirin 8020Unisoc Tiger T820
ModemIntegrated 5G modem (unannounced)Integrated 5G (sub-6)
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth—5.2

Media

Media comparison: Huawei Kirin 8020 versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecHuawei Kirin 8020Unisoc Tiger T820
Max display—FHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture—4K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin 8020 versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecHuawei Kirin 8020Unisoc Tiger T820
AnTuTu—470,000
Geekbench 6 (single)1,288+87%Top 40%690Bottom 24%
Geekbench 6 (multi)4,166+85%Top 34%2,250Bottom 39%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme882Bottom 18%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup