Huawei Kirin 9000S vs Samsung Exynos 1380
32CPU29.2
31.3GPU25
46.6Benchmarks47.3
34.5Efficiency63.2
4 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9000S3 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1380
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 1380 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 37.7 to 35.5, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+29) and benchmarks (+1). Huawei Kirin 9000S still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9000S
- Stronger GPU score: 31 vs 25
- 61% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 1,300 vs 808
- 20% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 3,300 vs 2,760
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1380
- Stronger efficiency score: 63 vs 35
- 33% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 9 W
- 29% lower process: 5 nm vs 7 nm
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2023 |
| Process | 7 nm | 5 nm+29% |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | 6 W+33% |
| Architecture | — | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.62 GHz Taishan Big + 3x2.15 GHz Taishan Mid + 4x1.53 GHz Cortex-A510 | 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.62 GHz+9% | 2.4 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Maleoon 910 | Arm Mali-G68 MP5 |
| GPU clock | 750 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | HiSilicon Da Vinci NPU | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem (unannounced) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 720,000Top 46% | 740,251+3%Top 45% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,050+4%Top 44% | 1,010Top 50% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,300+20%Top 38% | 2,760Top 50% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,300+61%Top 68% | 808Top 86% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 290,514Top 80% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 89,805Top 83% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 132,447Top 92% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 227,485Top 75% |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 9000Svs Unisoc Tiger T820VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2VSSamsung Exynos 1380vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1VSSamsung Exynos 1380vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020VSSamsung Exynos 1380vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870VSSamsung Exynos 1380vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080VS

