Huawei Kirin 9000S vs Samsung Exynos 2200
32CPU39.3
31.3GPU35.5
46.6Benchmarks57.3
34.5Efficiency66.5
1 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9000S6 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2200
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2200 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 46.8 to 35.5, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+32) and benchmarks (+11). Huawei Kirin 9000S still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9000S
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200
- Stronger CPU score: 39 vs 32
- Stronger GPU score: 36 vs 31
- Stronger benchmarks score: 57 vs 47
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 35
- 62% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 2,100 vs 1,300
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2022 |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm+43% |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | 9 W |
| Architecture | — | Armv9 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.62 GHz Taishan Big + 3x2.15 GHz Taishan Mid + 4x1.53 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 2.62 GHz | 2.8 GHz+7% |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Maleoon 910 | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
| GPU clock | 750 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | HiSilicon Da Vinci NPU | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem (unannounced) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 720,000Top 46% | 1,100,000+53%Top 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,050Top 44% | 1,600+52%Top 27% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,300Top 38% | 4,150+26%Top 30% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,300Top 68% | 2,100+62%Top 51% |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 9000Svs Unisoc Tiger T820VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VS

