Huawei Kirin 9010 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
36.2CPU39.3
33.2GPU35.5
—Benchmarks57.3
20Efficiencyspec-based66.5
2 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 90104 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2200
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2200 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 46.8 to 31.7, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+3) and GPU (+2). Huawei Kirin 9010 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9010
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200
- Stronger CPU score: 39 vs 36
- 43% lower process: 4 nm vs 7 nm
- 34% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 2,100 vs 1,573
- 22% higher Max clock: 2.8 GHz vs 2.3 GHz
- 11% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,600 vs 1,446
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9010 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2022 |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm+43% |
| TDP (typical) | — | 9 W |
| Architecture | ARM (HiSilicon cores + Cortex-A510) | Armv9 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9010 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.3 GHz HiSilicon Big + 3x2.18 GHz HiSilicon Mid + 4x1.55 GHz Cortex-A510 Little | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.8 GHz+22% |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9010 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | HiSilicon Maleoon 910 | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
| GPU clock | 750 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9010 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9010 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR5 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9010 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | — | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9010 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | — | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9010 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | — | 1,100,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,446Top 32% | 1,600+11%Top 27% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,484+8%Top 31% | 4,150Top 35% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,573Bottom 40% | 2,100+34%Top 49% |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 9010vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732GVSHuawei Kirin 9010vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750GVSHuawei Kirin 9010vs MediaTek Helio G99VSHuawei Kirin 9010vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VS
