Huawei Kirin 9020 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
36.1CPU39.3
36.8GPU35.5
—Benchmarks57.3
20Efficiencyspec-based66.5
2 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 90204 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2200
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2200 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 46.8 to 32.9, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+3). Huawei Kirin 9020 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9020
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200
- Stronger CPU score: 39 vs 36
- 43% lower process: 4 nm vs 7 nm
- 25% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,600 vs 1,285
- 12% higher Max clock: 2.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz
- 10% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 2,100 vs 1,907
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9020 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2022 |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm+43% |
| TDP (typical) | — | 9 W |
| Architecture | ARM (in-house HiSilicon cores) | Armv9 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9020 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.5 GHz HiSilicon Big + 3x2.15 GHz HiSilicon Mid + 4x1.6 GHz HiSilicon Little | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.8 GHz+12% |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9020 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | HiSilicon Maleoon 920 | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
| GPU clock | 840 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9020 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9020 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR5 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9020 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | — | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9020 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | — | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9020 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | — | 1,100,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,285Top 40% | 1,600+25%Top 27% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,505+9%Top 29% | 4,150Top 35% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,907Bottom 48% | 2,100+10%Top 49% |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 9020vs MediaTek Dimensity 7100VSHuawei Kirin 9020vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100+VSHuawei Kirin 9020vs Unisoc Tiger T760VSHuawei Kirin 9020vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VS
