Huawei Kirin 9030S vs Samsung Exynos 2500
37.6CPU57.2
31.5GPU54.3
61.4Benchmarks74.2
—AIspec-based85.9
—Efficiencyspec-based79.6
1 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9030S6 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 41.9, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+23) and CPU (+20). Huawei Kirin 9030S still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9030S
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 38
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 32
- Stronger benchmarks score: 74 vs 61
- 174% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 4,400 vs 1,606
- 81% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 8,200 vs 4,522
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9030S | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2026 | 2025 |
| Process | — | 3 nm |
| TDP (typical) | — | 8 W |
| Architecture | ARM (Taishan V124 cores) | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9030S | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x2.7 GHz Taishan V124 Big + 3x2.15 GHz Taishan V124 Mid + 4x1.62 GHz Taishan V124 Little | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.3 GHz+22% |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9030S | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | — | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9030S | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9030S | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9030S | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | — | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9030S | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | — | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9030S | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 1,293,328 | 2,150,000+66% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,336Top 39% | 2,300+72%Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,522Top 29% | 8,200+81%Top 12% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,606Bottom 39% | 4,400+174%Top 20% |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 9030Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 9030Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 9030Svs MediaTek Dimensity 7300VSHuawei Kirin 9030Svs Google TensorVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Google Tensor G6VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A17 ProVS
