Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro vs Samsung Exynos 1680

H
—Inno Score
VS
Samsung Exynos 1680
50.2Inno Score
—CPU38.7
—GPU40.8
—Benchmarks62.7
—AIspec-based56.5
—Efficiencyspec-based68
0 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro0 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1680

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 1680
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 1680
Announced20262026
Process—4 nm
Architecture—Armv9.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 1680
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 1680
Cores—8
Core configuration—1x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520
Max clock—2.9 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 1680
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 1680
GPU—Samsung Xclipse 550
GPU clock—1,200 MHz

AI

AI comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 1680
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 1680
NPU—Samsung NPU
AI performance—20 TOPS

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 1680
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 1680
Memory type—LPDDR5X

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 1680
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 1680
Modem—Integrated Exynos 5G modem
Max download—5.1 Gbps
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth6.06.1

Media

Media comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 1680
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 1680
Max display—FHD+ @ 144Hz
Video capture4K4K@60fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 1680
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 1680
AnTuTu—1,363,464
Geekbench 6 (single)—1,376Top 36%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—4,411Top 29%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—1,742Bottom 40%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup