Huawei Kirin 980 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
24.8CPU51.7
—GPU49.4
33.7Benchmarks71.2
37Efficiency66.5
1 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9807 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 57.9 to 30.3, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+38) and efficiency (+30). Huawei Kirin 980 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 980
- 11% lower TDP (typical): 8 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 25
- Stronger benchmarks score: 71 vs 34
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 37
- 345% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,914,857 vs 430,000
- 291% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,150 vs 550
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 980 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018 | 2023 |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm+43% |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W+11% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 980 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 + 2x1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz+23% |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 980 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MP10 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 980 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Dual NPU (Da Vinci predecessor) | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 980 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-2133 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 980 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated LTE Cat-21 | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | — |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 980 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 60Hz | — |
| Video capture | 4K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 980 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 430,000Top 68% | 1,914,857+345%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 550Top 78% | 2,150+291%Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,000Top 68% | 6,600+230%Top 15% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,800Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 637,914Top 26% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 562,338Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 289,405Top 40% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 425,200Top 29% |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 980vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845VSHuawei Kirin 980vs MediaTek Dimensity 700VSHuawei Kirin 980vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680VSHuawei Kirin 980vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVS
