Huawei Kirin 990 5G vs Samsung Exynos 2100
33.3CPU37.1
—GPU34.2
48.6Benchmarks47.5
—AIspec-based64
20Efficiencyspec-based55.9
4 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 990 5G6 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2100
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2100 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 44 to 34.9, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+4). Huawei Kirin 990 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 990 5G
- 30% higher AnTuTu 11 (Memory): 188,134 vs 144,909
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2100
- Stronger CPU score: 37 vs 33
- 40% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,430 vs 1,023
- 29% lower process: 5 nm vs 7 nm
- 15% higher AnTuTu 11 (UX): 221,794 vs 193,243
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 990 5G | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019 | 2021 |
| Process | 7 nm | 5 nm+29% |
| TDP (typical) | — | 9 W |
| Architecture | ARM (Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores) | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 990 5G | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 2x2.86 GHz Cortex-A76 + 2x2.36 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1 + 3x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.86 GHz | 2.9 GHz+1% |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 990 5G | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MP16 | Arm Mali-G78 MP14 |
| GPU clock | — | 854 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 990 5G | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | HUAWEI Da Vinci NPU (2x Ascend Lite + 1x Ascend Tiny) | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 26 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 990 5G | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 990 5G | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem (SA/NSA) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 2.3 Gbps | — |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 990 5G | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | — | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 990 5G | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 11 | 778,713+4%Bottom 27% | 746,547Bottom 22% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 267,234+6%Bottom 22% | 252,025Bottom 15% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 130,102+2%Bottom 34% | 127,819Bottom 31% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 188,134+30%Bottom 50% | 144,909Bottom 20% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 193,243Bottom 15% | 221,794+15%Bottom 29% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,023Top 50% | 1,430+40%Top 30% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,419Top 38% | 3,550+4%Top 37% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,500Bottom 47% |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 990 5Gvs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VSHuawei Kirin 990 5Gvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2VSHuawei Kirin 990 5Gvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685VSHuawei Kirin 990 5Gvs Huawei Kirin 9000SVSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Samsung Exynos 1480VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Google Tensor G2VS
