Huawei Kirin 990 5G vs Samsung Exynos 2600
33.3CPU72.6
—GPU77.4
48.6Benchmarks81.1
20Efficiencyspec-based100
0 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 990 5G10 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 34.9, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+39) and benchmarks (+32). Huawei Kirin 990 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 990 5G
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 33
- Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 49
- 709% higher AnTuTu 11 (GPU): 1,052,625 vs 130,102
- 263% higher AnTuTu: 2,827,538 vs 778,713
- 255% higher AnTuTu 11 (CPU): 947,776 vs 267,234
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 990 5G | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019 | 2026 |
| Process | 7 nm | 2 nm+71% |
| Architecture | ARM (Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores) | Armv9.3 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 990 5G | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 2x2.86 GHz Cortex-A76 + 2x2.36 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) |
| Max clock | 2.86 GHz | — |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 990 5G | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MP16 | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 990 5G | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | HUAWEI Da Vinci NPU (2x Ascend Lite + 1x Ascend Tiny) | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 990 5G | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 990 5G | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem (SA/NSA) | — |
| Max download | 2.3 Gbps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 990 5G | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 11 | 778,713Bottom 27% | 2,827,538+263%Top 12% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 267,234Bottom 22% | 947,776+255%Top 8% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 130,102Bottom 34% | 1,052,625+709%Top 12% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 188,134Bottom 50% | 347,409+85%Top 22% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 193,243Bottom 15% | 479,728+148%Top 27% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,023Top 50% | 2,995+193%Top 8% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,419Top 38% | 10,824+217%Top 5% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 7,230Top 7% |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 990 5Gvs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VSHuawei Kirin 990 5Gvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2VSHuawei Kirin 990 5Gvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685VSHuawei Kirin 990 5Gvs Huawei Kirin 9000SVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Xiaomi Xring O3VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVS
