Samsung Exynos 2600 vs Xiaomi Xring O3
72.6CPU92.1
77.4GPU—
81.1Benchmarks—
—AIspec-based100
100Efficiencyspec-based84
1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 26002 spec wins — Xiaomi Xring O3
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Xiaomi Xring O3 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- 33% lower process: 2 nm vs 3 nm
Reasons to pick the Xiaomi Xring O3
- Stronger CPU score: 92 vs 73
- 41% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 15,221 vs 10,824
- 32% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 3,945 vs 2,995
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2026 | 2026 |
| Process | 2 nm+33% | 3 nm |
| Architecture | Armv9.3 | Armv9.3 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 10 | 10 |
| Core configuration | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) | 2x4.35 GHz C1-Ultra + 4x3.68 GHz C1-Premium + 4x3.15 GHz C1-Pro |
| Max clock | — | 4.35 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 960 | Arm Mali-G2-Ultra NX MP16 |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | Xiaomi NPU (self-developed) |
| AI performance | — | 200 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR6-10667 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 113.8 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | — | 6.0 |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 2,827,538Top 12% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 947,776Top 9% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 1,052,625Top 12% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 347,409Top 23% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 479,728Top 25% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,995Top 9% | 3,945+32%Top 3% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 10,824Top 5% | 15,221+41%Top 1% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 7,230Top 7% | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VSXiaomi Xring O3vs MediaTek Dimensity 9600 ProVSXiaomi Xring O3vs Huawei Kirin 9050 ProVSXiaomi Xring O3vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSXiaomi Xring O3vs Samsung Exynos 2500VS