Huawei Kirin T90A vs Samsung Exynos 2200
34.4CPU39.3
28.4GPU35.5
—Benchmarks57.3
—Efficiencyspec-based66.5
1 spec wins — Huawei Kirin T90A4 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2200
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2200 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 46.8 to 31.7, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+7) and CPU (+5). Huawei Kirin T90A still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin T90A
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200
- Stronger CPU score: 39 vs 34
- Stronger GPU score: 36 vs 28
- 70% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 2,100 vs 1,233
- 30% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,600 vs 1,229
- 12% higher Max clock: 2.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin T90A | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2022 |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | — | 9 W |
| Architecture | ARM (HiSilicon cores + Cortex-A510) | Armv9 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin T90A | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.5 GHz Big + 3x2.2 GHz Mid + 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A510 Little | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.8 GHz+12% |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin T90A | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | HiSilicon Maleoon 910 | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin T90A | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin T90A | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR5 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin T90A | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | — | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin T90A | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | — | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin T90A | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | — | 1,100,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,229Top 37% | 1,600+30%Top 25% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,987Top 33% | 4,150+4%Top 32% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,233Bottom 39% | 2,100+70%Top 43% |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin T90Avs Huawei Kirin 9010VSHuawei Kirin T90Avs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732GVSHuawei Kirin T90Avs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750GVSHuawei Kirin T90Avs MediaTek Helio G99VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VS
