Huawei Kirin T90A vs Samsung Exynos 2400
34.4CPU51.7
28.4GPU49.4
—Benchmarks71.2
—Efficiencyspec-based66.5
1 spec wins — Huawei Kirin T90A5 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 57.9 to 31.7, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+21) and CPU (+17). Huawei Kirin T90A still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin T90A
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 34
- Stronger GPU score: 49 vs 28
- 208% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,800 vs 1,233
- 75% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,150 vs 1,229
- 66% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 6,600 vs 3,987
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin T90A | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2023 |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | — | 9 W |
| Architecture | ARM (HiSilicon cores + Cortex-A510) | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin T90A | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x2.5 GHz Big + 3x2.2 GHz Mid + 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A510 Little | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz+28% |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin T90A | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | HiSilicon Maleoon 910 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin T90A | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin T90A | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin T90A | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | — | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin T90A | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | — | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin T90A | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | — | 1,914,857Top 34% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 637,914Top 31% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 562,338Top 34% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 289,405Top 43% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 425,200Top 34% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,229Top 37% | 2,150+75%Top 17% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,987Top 33% | 6,600+66%Top 16% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,233Bottom 39% | 3,800+208%Top 23% |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin T90Avs Huawei Kirin 9010VSHuawei Kirin T90Avs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732GVSHuawei Kirin T90Avs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750GVSHuawei Kirin T90Avs MediaTek Helio G99VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8500VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VS
