Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin T90A vs Samsung Exynos 2600

H
31.7Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Samsung Exynos 2600
80.4Inno Score
34.4CPU72.6
28.4GPU77.4
—Benchmarks81.1
—Efficiencyspec-based100
0 spec wins — Huawei Kirin T90A5 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600

InnoReviews verdict

Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 31.7, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+49) and CPU (+38). Huawei Kirin T90A still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin T90A

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600

  • Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 34
  • Stronger GPU score: 77 vs 28
  • 486% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 7,230 vs 1,233
  • 171% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,824 vs 3,987
  • 144% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,995 vs 1,229

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecHuawei Kirin T90ASamsung Exynos 2600
Announced20242026
Process—2 nm
ArchitectureARM (HiSilicon cores + Cortex-A510)Armv9.3

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecHuawei Kirin T90ASamsung Exynos 2600
Cores810+25%
Core configuration1x2.5 GHz Big + 3x2.2 GHz Mid + 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A510 Little1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency)
Max clock2.5 GHz—

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecHuawei Kirin T90ASamsung Exynos 2600
GPUHiSilicon Maleoon 910Samsung Xclipse 960

AI

AI comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecHuawei Kirin T90ASamsung Exynos 2600
NPU—Samsung NPU

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecHuawei Kirin T90ASamsung Exynos 2600
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6—
Bluetooth5.2—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecHuawei Kirin T90ASamsung Exynos 2600
AnTuTu—2,827,538Top 12%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—947,776Top 8%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—1,052,625Top 12%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—347,409Top 22%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—479,728Top 27%
Geekbench 6 (single)1,229Top 37%2,995+144%Top 8%
Geekbench 6 (multi)3,987Top 33%10,824+171%Top 5%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,233Bottom 39%7,230+486%Top 7%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup