Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin T90A vs Unisoc Tiger T820

H
31.7Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Unisoc Tiger T820
35.6Inno Score
34.4CPU27
28.4GPU—
—Benchmarks35.9
—Efficiencyspec-based52.5
3 spec wins — Huawei Kirin T90A1 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T820

InnoReviews verdict

Unisoc Tiger T820 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 35.6 to 31.7. Huawei Kirin T90A still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin T90A

  • Stronger CPU score: 34 vs 27
  • 78% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,229 vs 690
  • 77% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 3,987 vs 2,250

Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T820

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecHuawei Kirin T90AUnisoc Tiger T820
Announced20242023
Process—6 nm
TDP (typical)—6 W
ArchitectureARM (HiSilicon cores + Cortex-A510)Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecHuawei Kirin T90AUnisoc Tiger T820
Cores88
Core configuration1x2.5 GHz Big + 3x2.2 GHz Mid + 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A510 Little1x2.7 GHz Cortex-A76 + 3x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.5 GHz2.7 GHz+8%

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecHuawei Kirin T90AUnisoc Tiger T820
GPUHiSilicon Maleoon 910Arm Mali-G57 MP4

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecHuawei Kirin T90AUnisoc Tiger T820
Memory type—LPDDR4X-2133
Max bandwidth—17.1 GB/s

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecHuawei Kirin T90AUnisoc Tiger T820
Modem—Integrated 5G (sub-6)
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.25.2

Media

Media comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecHuawei Kirin T90AUnisoc Tiger T820
Max display—FHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture—4K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecHuawei Kirin T90AUnisoc Tiger T820
AnTuTu—470,000
Geekbench 6 (single)1,229+78%Top 37%690Bottom 23%
Geekbench 6 (multi)3,987+77%Top 33%2,250Bottom 40%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,233Bottom 39%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup