Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin X90A vs Unisoc T8300

Huawei Kirin X90A
—Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T8300
31.4Inno Score
21.9CPU25.3
—GPU27.5
—Benchmarks42.1
—Efficiencyspec-based36
0 spec wins — Huawei Kirin X90A1 spec wins — Unisoc T8300

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin X90A lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin X90A

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T8300

  • Stronger CPU score: 25 vs 22

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin X90A versus Unisoc T8300
SpecHuawei Kirin X90AUnisoc T8300
Announced20252025
Process—6 nm
Architecture—Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin X90A versus Unisoc T8300
SpecHuawei Kirin X90AUnisoc T8300
Cores88
Core configuration—2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.07 GHz2.2 GHz+6%

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin X90A versus Unisoc T8300
SpecHuawei Kirin X90AUnisoc T8300
GPU—Arm Mali-G57 MC2
GPU clock—950 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin X90A versus Unisoc T8300
SpecHuawei Kirin X90AUnisoc T8300
Memory type—LPDDR4X-2133

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin X90A versus Unisoc T8300
SpecHuawei Kirin X90AUnisoc T8300
Modem—Integrated 5G (SA/NSA), 3GPP Release 17, LTE Cat-13 (DL) / Cat-13 (UL)
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 5 (Wi-Fi 6 optional)
Bluetooth5.25.4

Media

Media comparison: Huawei Kirin X90A versus Unisoc T8300
SpecHuawei Kirin X90AUnisoc T8300
Max display—FHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture—2K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin X90A versus Unisoc T8300
SpecHuawei Kirin X90AUnisoc T8300
AnTuTu—601,751Bottom 15%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—245,178Bottom 15%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—41,628Bottom 10%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—121,192Bottom 8%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—193,753Bottom 18%
Geekbench 6 (single)—883Bottom 37%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—2,013Bottom 31%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—349Bottom 17%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup