Skip to content
InnoReviews

MediaTek Dimensity 6400 vs Unisoc T7300

MediaTek Dimensity 6400
26.6Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T7300
—Inno Score
26.3CPU25.3
21.3GPU65
36Efficiencyspec-based36
1 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 64000 spec wins — Unisoc T7300

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Unisoc T7300 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 6400

  • 14% higher Max clock: 2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T7300

  • Stronger GPU score: 65 vs 21

General

General comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6400 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6400Unisoc T7300
Announced20252025
Process6 nm6 nm
ArchitectureArmv8.2Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6400 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6400Unisoc T7300
Cores88
Core configuration2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A552x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.5 GHz+14%2.2 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6400 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6400Unisoc T7300
GPUArm Mali-G57 MC2Arm Mali-G57 MC2
GPU clock—950 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6400 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6400Unisoc T7300
Memory typeLPDDR4X-4266LPDDR4X-2133

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6400 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6400Unisoc T7300
ModemIntegrated 5G modem (3GPP Release 16)Integrated LTE Cat-7 (DL) / Cat-13 (UL)
Max download3.3 Gbps—
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5 (Wi-Fi 6 optional)
Bluetooth5.25.4

Media

Media comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6400 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6400Unisoc T7300
Max displayFHD+ @ 120HzFHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture—2K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6400 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6400Unisoc T7300
Geekbench 6 (single)792Bottom 34%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,041Bottom 32%—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme356Bottom 6%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup