MediaTek Dimensity 7025 vs Samsung Exynos 1680
28CPU38.7
—GPU40.8
44.6Benchmarks62.7
—AIspec-based56.5
54.9Efficiencyspec-based68
0 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 70255 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1680
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 1680 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 50.2 to 39.3, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+18) and CPU (+11). MediaTek Dimensity 7025 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 7025
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1680
- Stronger CPU score: 39 vs 28
- Stronger benchmarks score: 63 vs 45
- 96% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 4,411 vs 2,250
- 45% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,376 vs 950
- 33% lower process: 4 nm vs 6 nm
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2026 |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm+33% |
| TDP (typical) | 5 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.9 GHz+16% |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Samsung Xclipse 550 |
| GPU clock | — | 1,200 MHz |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 20 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-3200 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G (sub-6) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | — | 5.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6.1 |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 120Hz | FHD+ @ 144Hz |
| Video capture | 2K@30fps | 4K@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 664,087Bottom 17% | 1,363,464 |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 255,422Bottom 19% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 57,772Bottom 17% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 150,942Bottom 19% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 199,951Bottom 17% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 950Bottom 42% | 1,376+45%Top 36% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,250Bottom 39% | 4,411+96%Top 31% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,742Bottom 42% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 7025vs Dimensity 7400 UltraVSMediaTek Dimensity 7025vs Samsung Exynos 1280VSMediaTek Dimensity 7025vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1VSMediaTek Dimensity 7025vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Apple A15 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 1680vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Google Tensor G4VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4VS

