MediaTek Dimensity 7025 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
28CPU51.7
—GPU49.4
44.6Benchmarks71.2
54.9Efficiency66.5
2 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 702510 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 57.9 to 39.3, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+27) and CPU (+24). MediaTek Dimensity 7025 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 7025
- 44% lower TDP (typical): 5 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 28
- Stronger benchmarks score: 71 vs 45
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 55
- 873% higher AnTuTu 10 (GPU): 562,338 vs 57,772
- 193% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 6,600 vs 2,250
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2023 |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm+33% |
| TDP (typical) | 5 W+44% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz+28% |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-3200 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G (sub-6) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 120Hz | — |
| Video capture | 2K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 664,087Top 50% | 1,914,857+188%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 950Top 55% | 2,150+126%Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,250Top 59% | 6,600+193%Top 15% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,800Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | 255,422Top 83% | 637,914+150%Top 26% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | 57,772Top 86% | 562,338+873%Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | 150,942Top 83% | 289,405+92%Top 40% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | 199,951Top 86% | 425,200+113%Top 29% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 7025vs Samsung Exynos 1280VSMediaTek Dimensity 7025vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1VSMediaTek Dimensity 7025vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2VSMediaTek Dimensity 7025vs Apple A13 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVS
