Skip to content
InnoReviews

MediaTek Dimensity 7300 vs Samsung Exynos 1610

MediaTek Dimensity 7300
41.3Inno Score
VS
S
—Inno Score
30.3CPU30.7
25.1GPU—
51.8Benchmarks—
76.2Efficiencyspec-based—
1 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 73001 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1610

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

General

General comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 7300 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 7300Samsung Exynos 1610
Announced20242026
Process4 nm—
TDP (typical)5 W—
ArchitectureArmv8.2—

CPU

CPU comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 7300 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 7300Samsung Exynos 1610
Cores88
Core configuration4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A552 + 6
Max clock2.5 GHz+4%2.4 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 7300 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 7300Samsung Exynos 1610
GPUArm Mali-G615 MC2Mali-G68

AI

AI comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 7300 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 7300Samsung Exynos 1610
NPUMediaTek APU 655—

Memory

Memory comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 7300 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 7300Samsung Exynos 1610
Memory typeLPDDR5-6400—
Max bandwidth51.2 GB/s—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 7300 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 7300Samsung Exynos 1610
ModemIntegrated 5G modem—
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.45.3

Media

Media comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 7300 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 7300Samsung Exynos 1610
Max displayFHD+ @ 120Hz—
Video capture4K@30fps—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 7300 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 7300Samsung Exynos 1610
AnTuTu884,953Bottom 36%—
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)319,814Bottom 36%—
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)126,561Bottom 29%—
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)156,376Bottom 29%—
AnTuTu 11 (UX)282,202Bottom 44%—
Geekbench 6 (single)1,030Top 50%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,930Top 48%—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme830Bottom 20%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup