MediaTek Dimensity 8020 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
33.1CPU51.7
28.7GPU49.4
49.6Benchmarks71.2
36Efficiencyspec-based66.5
0 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 802011 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 57.9 to 36, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+22) and GPU (+21). MediaTek Dimensity 8020 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 8020
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 33
- Stronger GPU score: 49 vs 29
- Stronger benchmarks score: 71 vs 50
- 303% higher AnTuTu 11 (GPU): 562,338 vs 139,570
- 201% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,800 vs 1,262
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8020 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2023 |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm+33% |
| TDP (typical) | — | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8020 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz+23% |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8020 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G77 MC9 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8020 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek NPU 570 | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8020 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8020 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 4.7 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8020 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 144Hz | — |
| Video capture | 4K | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8020 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 11 | 809,277Bottom 34% | 1,914,857+137%Top 34% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 282,056Bottom 24% | 637,914+126%Top 31% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 139,570Bottom 39% | 562,338+303%Top 34% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 138,421Bottom 15% | 289,405+109%Top 43% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 249,230Bottom 39% | 425,200+71%Top 34% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,120Top 43% | 2,150+92%Top 17% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,600Top 36% | 6,600+83%Top 16% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,262Bottom 43% | 3,800+201%Top 23% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 8020vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4VSMediaTek Dimensity 8020vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSMediaTek Dimensity 8020vs MediaTek Dimensity 900VSMediaTek Dimensity 8020vs MediaTek Helio G100VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8500VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VS

