MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Samsung Exynos 1680
36.6CPU38.7
33.1GPU40.8
53.6Benchmarks62.7
—AIspec-based56.5
73.8Efficiencyspec-based68
2 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 82004 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1680
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 1680 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 50.2 to 45.6, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+9) and GPU (+8). MediaTek Dimensity 8200 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 8200
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1680
- Stronger GPU score: 41 vs 33
- Stronger benchmarks score: 63 vs 54
- 44% higher AnTuTu: 1,363,464 vs 950,000
- 18% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 4,411 vs 3,750
- 17% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,376 vs 1,180
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2026 |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 + 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.1 GHz+7% | 2.9 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC6 | Samsung Xclipse 550 |
| GPU clock | — | 1,200 MHz |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek APU 580 | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 20 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | — | 5.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 6.1 |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 144Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 950,000 | 1,363,464+44% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,180Top 42% | 1,376+17%Top 36% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,750Top 38% | 4,411+18%Top 31% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,800+3%Bottom 43% | 1,742Bottom 42% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 8200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSMediaTek Dimensity 8200vs Samsung Exynos 2200VSMediaTek Dimensity 8200vs Apple A14 BionicVSMediaTek Dimensity 8200vs Samsung Exynos 2100VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Apple A15 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 1680vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Google Tensor G4VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4VS

