MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Samsung Exynos 2600
36.6CPU72.6
33.1GPU77.4
53.6Benchmarks81.1
73.8Efficiencyspec-based100
0 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 82006 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 45.6, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+44) and CPU (+36). MediaTek Dimensity 8200 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 8200
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 37
- Stronger GPU score: 77 vs 33
- Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 54
- 302% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 7,230 vs 1,800
- 189% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,824 vs 3,750
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2026 |
| Process | 4 nm | 2 nm+50% |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.3 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 + 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) |
| Max clock | 3.1 GHz | — |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC6 | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek APU 580 | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | — |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 950,000 | 2,827,538Top 14% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 947,776Top 9% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 1,052,625Top 14% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 347,409Top 25% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 479,728Top 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,180Top 42% | 2,995+154%Top 10% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,750Top 38% | 10,824+189%Top 6% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,800Bottom 43% | 7,230+302%Top 8% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 8200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSMediaTek Dimensity 8200vs Samsung Exynos 2200VSMediaTek Dimensity 8200vs Apple A14 BionicVSMediaTek Dimensity 8200vs Samsung Exynos 2100VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VS

