MediaTek Dimensity 8400 vs Samsung Exynos 1680
45.9CPU38.7
46.1GPU40.8
71.7Benchmarks62.7
—AIspec-based56.5
73.8Efficiencyspec-based68
5 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 84001 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1680
InnoReviews verdict
MediaTek Dimensity 8400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 56.3 to 50.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+9) and CPU (+7). Samsung Exynos 1680 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 8400
- Stronger CPU score: 46 vs 39
- Stronger GPU score: 46 vs 41
- Stronger benchmarks score: 72 vs 63
- 95% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,400 vs 1,742
- 45% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 6,400 vs 4,411
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1680
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2026 |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.25 GHz Cortex-A725 + 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A725 + 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A725 | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.25 GHz+12% | 2.9 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G720 MC7 | Samsung Xclipse 550 |
| GPU clock | — | 1,200 MHz |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek NPU 880 | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 20 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-8533 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 68.3 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 5.2 Gbps+1% | 5.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6.1 |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 144Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 1,946,644Top 33% | 1,363,464 |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 560,176Top 38% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 642,040Top 30% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 339,619Top 30% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 404,809Top 38% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,450+5%Top 31% | 1,376Top 36% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,400+45%Top 19% | 4,411Top 31% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,400+95%Top 35% | 1,742Bottom 42% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 8400vs Apple A16 BionicVSMediaTek Dimensity 8400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSMediaTek Dimensity 8400vs Samsung Exynos 2400eVSMediaTek Dimensity 8400vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Apple A15 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 1680vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Google Tensor G4VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4VS

