MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
42.2CPU51.7
36.7GPU49.4
56.1Benchmarks71.2
69Efficiency66.5
1 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 90007 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 57.9 to 48.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+15) and GPU (+13). MediaTek Dimensity 9000 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 9000
- 11% lower TDP (typical): 8 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 42
- Stronger GPU score: 49 vs 37
- Stronger benchmarks score: 71 vs 56
- 82% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,914,857 vs 1,050,000
- 69% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,800 vs 2,250
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2023 |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W+11% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.05 GHz | 3.2 GHz+5% |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G710 MC10 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek APU 590 | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-7500 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 60 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 7 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | WQHD+ @ 144Hz | — |
| Video capture | — | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,050,000Top 29% | 1,914,857+82%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,730Top 26% | 2,150+24%Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,350Top 26% | 6,600+52%Top 15% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,250Top 50% | 3,800+69%Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 637,914Top 26% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 562,338Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 289,405Top 40% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 425,200Top 29% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 9000vs Dimensity 7400 UltraVSMediaTek Dimensity 9000vs Google Tensor G3VSMediaTek Dimensity 9000vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VSMediaTek Dimensity 9000vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVS

