MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ vs Samsung Exynos 2500
47CPU57.9
48GPU54
64.6Benchmarks73.1
0AI85.9
69Efficiency79.6
1 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 9200+7 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66 to 54.9, pulling ahead mainly in AI (+86) and CPU (+11). MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 9200+
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 58 vs 47
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 48
- Stronger benchmarks score: 73 vs 65
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 69
- 46% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 8,200 vs 5,600
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2025 |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm+25% |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | 8 W |
| Architecture | Armv9 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 + 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.35 GHz+2% | 3.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Immortalis-G715 MC11 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek APU 690 | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-8533 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 68.3 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | WQHD+ @ 144Hz | — |
| Video capture | — | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,700,000 | 2,150,000+26% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,050 | 2,300+12% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 5,600 | 8,200+46% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,800 | 4,400+16% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+vs Samsung Exynos 2400VSMediaTek Dimensity 9200+vs Apple A16 BionicVSMediaTek Dimensity 9200+vs Google Tensor G5VSMediaTek Dimensity 9200+vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300+VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A17 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VS

