MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
46.2CPU51.7
50.7GPU49.4
65.1Benchmarks71.2
69Efficiencyspec-based66.5
1 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 92006 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 57.9 to 55.4, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+6) and CPU (+6). MediaTek Dimensity 9200 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 9200
- 11% lower TDP (typical): 8 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 46
- Stronger benchmarks score: 71 vs 65
- 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8
- 25% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 6,600 vs 5,300
- 10% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,150 vs 1,950
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2023 |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W+11% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 + 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.05 GHz | 3.2 GHz+5% |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Immortalis-G715 MC11 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
| GPU clock | 981 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek APU 690 | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-8533 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 68.3 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | WQHD+ @ 144Hz | — |
| Video capture | — | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 1,500,000 | 1,914,857Top 36% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 637,914Top 33% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 562,338Top 36% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 289,405Top 46% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 425,200Top 36% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,950Top 24% | 2,150+10%Top 19% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 5,300Top 25% | 6,600+25%Top 18% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,600Top 30% | 3,800+6%Top 25% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 9200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VSMediaTek Dimensity 9200vs Samsung Exynos 2400eVSMediaTek Dimensity 9200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3VSMediaTek Dimensity 9200vs Apple A16 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8500VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VS

