MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
46.2CPU51.7
50.7GPU49.4
65.1Benchmarks71.2
69Efficiency66.5
1 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 92007 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 57.9 to 55.4, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+6) and CPU (+6). MediaTek Dimensity 9200 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 9200
- 11% lower TDP (typical): 8 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 46
- Stronger benchmarks score: 71 vs 65
- 28% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,914,857 vs 1,500,000
- 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8
- 25% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 6,600 vs 5,300
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2023 |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W+11% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 + 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.05 GHz | 3.2 GHz+5% |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Immortalis-G715 MC11 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
| GPU clock | 981 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek APU 690 | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-8533 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 68.3 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | WQHD+ @ 144Hz | — |
| Video capture | — | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,500,000Top 19% | 1,914,857+28%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,950Top 21% | 2,150+10%Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 5,300Top 21% | 6,600+25%Top 15% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,600Top 27% | 3,800+6%Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 637,914Top 26% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 562,338Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 289,405Top 40% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 425,200Top 29% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 9200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VSMediaTek Dimensity 9200vs Samsung Exynos 2400eVSMediaTek Dimensity 9200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3VSMediaTek Dimensity 9200vs Apple A16 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVS

