MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ vs Samsung Exynos 2400
66.2CPU51.7
69.8GPU49.4
80.7Benchmarks71.2
77.2Efficiency66.5
11 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 9400+1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ wins this mobile chipset face-off, 72.3 to 57.9, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+20) and CPU (+15). Samsung Exynos 2400 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+
- Stronger CPU score: 66 vs 52
- Stronger GPU score: 70 vs 49
- Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 71
- Stronger efficiency score: 77 vs 67
- 68% higher AnTuTu 10 (GPU): 946,941 vs 562,338
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2023 |
| Process | 3 nm+25% | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x3.73 GHz Cortex-X925 + 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 + 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720 | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.73 GHz+17% | 3.2 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Immortalis-G925 MC12 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek NPU 890 | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-10667 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 85.3 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G-A modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 7 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | WQHD+ @ 180Hz | — |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 2,784,235+45%Top 4% | 1,914,857Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,900+35%Top 9% | 2,150Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 9,000+36%Top 6% | 6,600Top 15% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 6,300+66%Top 5% | 3,800Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | 829,825+30%Top 12% | 637,914Top 26% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | 946,941+68%Top 12% | 562,338Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | 370,838+28%Top 6% | 289,405Top 40% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | 636,631+50%Top 9% | 425,200Top 29% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 9400+vs Apple A19 ProVSMediaTek Dimensity 9400+vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VSMediaTek Dimensity 9400+vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400VSMediaTek Dimensity 9400+vs Apple A19VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVS

