MediaTek Dimensity 9400e vs Samsung Exynos 1610
55.7CPU30.7
61.6GPU—
77.1Benchmarks—
68Efficiencyspec-based—
1 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 9400e1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1610
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 9400e
- Stronger CPU score: 56 vs 31
- 42% higher Max clock: 3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400e | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2026 |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| Architecture | Armv9.2-A | — |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400e | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 + 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720 | 2 + 6 |
| Max clock | 3.4 GHz+42% | 2.4 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400e | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Mali-G68 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400e | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek NPU 790 | — |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400e | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X / LPDDR5T-9600 | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400e | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem (3GPP R16) | — |
| Max download | 7 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.3 |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400e | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | 4K @ 120Hz / WQHD @ 180Hz | — |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400e | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 2,415,876Top 24% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 726,809Top 24% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 795,971Top 26% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 335,549Top 31% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 557,547Top 21% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,265Top 16% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,439Top 14% | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 5,300Top 13% | — |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 9400evs Apple A17 ProVSMediaTek Dimensity 9400evs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VSMediaTek Dimensity 9400evs Google Tensor G6VSMediaTek Dimensity 9400evs Samsung Exynos 2500VSSamsung Exynos 1610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 1610vs MediaTek Dimensity 7100VSSamsung Exynos 1610vs MediaTek Dimensity 6360VSSamsung Exynos 1610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5VS