MediaTek Dimensity 9400e vs Samsung Exynos 2400
55.7CPU51.7
61.6GPU49.4
77.1Benchmarks71.2
68Efficiencyspec-based66.5
10 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 9400e1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
MediaTek Dimensity 9400e wins this mobile chipset face-off, 64.1 to 57.9, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+12) and benchmarks (+6). Samsung Exynos 2400 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 9400e
- Stronger CPU score: 56 vs 52
- Stronger GPU score: 62 vs 49
- Stronger benchmarks score: 77 vs 71
- 42% higher AnTuTu 11 (GPU): 795,971 vs 562,338
- 39% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 5,300 vs 3,800
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400e | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2023 |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | — | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.2-A | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400e | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 + 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720 | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.4 GHz+6% | 3.2 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400e | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400e | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek NPU 790 | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400e | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X / LPDDR5T-9600 | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400e | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem (3GPP R16) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 7 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400e | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | 4K @ 120Hz / WQHD @ 180Hz | — |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400e | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 11 | 2,415,876+26%Top 24% | 1,914,857Top 36% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 726,809+14%Top 24% | 637,914Top 34% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 795,971+42%Top 26% | 562,338Top 36% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 335,549+16%Top 31% | 289,405Top 47% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 557,547+31%Top 21% | 425,200Top 36% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,265+5%Top 16% | 2,150Top 18% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,439+13%Top 14% | 6,600Top 17% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 5,300+39%Top 13% | 3,800Top 25% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 9400evs Apple A17 ProVSMediaTek Dimensity 9400evs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VSMediaTek Dimensity 9400evs Google Tensor G6VSMediaTek Dimensity 9400evs Samsung Exynos 2500VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8500VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VS