Skip to content
InnoReviews

MediaTek Helio G100 vs Unisoc T8200

MediaTek Helio G100
36.4Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T8200
—Inno Score
24.3CPU28
—GPU55
40.8Benchmarks—
54.9Efficiencyspec-based36
0 spec wins — MediaTek Helio G1002 spec wins — Unisoc T8200

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Unisoc T8200 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the MediaTek Helio G100

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T8200

  • Stronger CPU score: 28 vs 24

General

General comparison: MediaTek Helio G100 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecMediaTek Helio G100Unisoc T8200
Announced20242025
Process6 nm6 nm
TDP (typical)5 W—
ArchitectureArmv8.2Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: MediaTek Helio G100 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecMediaTek Helio G100Unisoc T8200
Cores88
Core configuration2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A552x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.2 GHz2.3 GHz+5%

GPU

GPU comparison: MediaTek Helio G100 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecMediaTek Helio G100Unisoc T8200
GPUArm Mali-G57 MC2Arm Mali-G57 MC2
GPU clock—850 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: MediaTek Helio G100 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecMediaTek Helio G100Unisoc T8200
Memory typeLPDDR4X-2133LPDDR4X-2133
Max bandwidth17.1 GB/s—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: MediaTek Helio G100 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecMediaTek Helio G100Unisoc T8200
ModemIntegrated LTE Cat-13Integrated 5G (SA/NSA)
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6 (1x1, optional)
Bluetooth5.25.4

Media

Media comparison: MediaTek Helio G100 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecMediaTek Helio G100Unisoc T8200
Max displayFHD+ @ 120HzFHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture2K@30fps4K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: MediaTek Helio G100 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecMediaTek Helio G100Unisoc T8200
AnTuTu571,014Bottom 8%—
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)213,161Bottom 11%—
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)49,741Bottom 13%—
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)142,531Bottom 13%—
AnTuTu 11 (UX)165,581Bottom 6%—
Geekbench 6 (single)740Bottom 29%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,050Bottom 33%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup