Skip to content
InnoReviews

MediaTek Helio G200 vs MediaTek MT8755

MediaTek Helio G200
37.2Inno Score
VS
MediaTek MT8755
—Inno Score
25.6CPU30.7
41.3Benchmarks—
54.9Efficiencyspec-based36
0 spec wins — MediaTek Helio G2000 spec wins — MediaTek MT8755

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: MediaTek MT8755 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the MediaTek Helio G200

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the MediaTek MT8755

  • Stronger CPU score: 31 vs 26

General

General comparison: MediaTek Helio G200 versus MediaTek MT8755
SpecMediaTek Helio G200MediaTek MT8755
Announced20252025
Process6 nm6 nm
TDP (typical)5 W—
ArchitectureArmv8.2Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: MediaTek Helio G200 versus MediaTek MT8755
SpecMediaTek Helio G200MediaTek MT8755
Cores88
Core configuration2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A552x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.4 GHz2.4 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: MediaTek Helio G200 versus MediaTek MT8755
SpecMediaTek Helio G200MediaTek MT8755
GPUArm Mali-G57 MC2Arm Mali-G57 MC2

Memory

Memory comparison: MediaTek Helio G200 versus MediaTek MT8755
SpecMediaTek Helio G200MediaTek MT8755
Memory typeLPDDR4X-2133LPDDR4X-4266
Max bandwidth17.1 GB/s—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: MediaTek Helio G200 versus MediaTek MT8755
SpecMediaTek Helio G200MediaTek MT8755
ModemIntegrated LTE Cat-13Integrated 5G modem (3GPP Release 16)
Max download—3.3 Gbps
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.4—

Media

Media comparison: MediaTek Helio G200 versus MediaTek MT8755
SpecMediaTek Helio G200MediaTek MT8755
Max displayFHD+ @ 144Hz—
Video capture2K@30fps—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: MediaTek Helio G200 versus MediaTek MT8755
SpecMediaTek Helio G200MediaTek MT8755
AnTuTu581,818Bottom 13%—
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)212,630Bottom 12%—
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)47,609Bottom 15%—
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)152,829Bottom 29%—
AnTuTu 11 (UX)168,750Bottom 12%—
Geekbench 6 (single)760Bottom 32%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,100Bottom 36%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup