MediaTek Helio G200 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
25.6CPU51.7
—GPU49.4
41.3Benchmarks71.2
54.9Efficiency66.5
2 spec wins — MediaTek Helio G20010 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 57.9 to 37.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+30) and CPU (+26). MediaTek Helio G200 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Helio G200
- 44% lower TDP (typical): 5 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 26
- Stronger benchmarks score: 71 vs 41
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 55
- 1081% higher AnTuTu 10 (GPU): 562,338 vs 47,609
- 229% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,914,857 vs 581,818
General
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G200 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2023 |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm+33% |
| TDP (typical) | 5 W+44% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G200 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz+33% |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G200 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G200 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G200 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-2133 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G200 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated LTE Cat-13 | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G200 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 144Hz | — |
| Video capture | 2K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G200 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 581,818Top 56% | 1,914,857+229%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 760Top 66% | 2,150+183%Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,100Top 63% | 6,600+214%Top 15% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,800Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | 212,630Top 95% | 637,914+200%Top 26% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | 47,609Top 92% | 562,338+1081%Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | 152,829Top 78% | 289,405+89%Top 40% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | 168,750Top 95% | 425,200+152%Top 29% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Helio G200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865VSMediaTek Helio G200vs MediaTek Dimensity 920VSMediaTek Helio G200vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200VSMediaTek Helio G200vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVS
